museum-digital/musdb-md-xm-xsls
37
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests 1 Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add lido:type attributes to recordInfoSet / recordMetadataDate #13

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-12-13 14:40:56 +01:00 by awinkler · 2 comments
awinkler commented 2025-12-13 14:40:56 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

It would be useful to add type attributes to recordInfoSet / recordMetadataDate so that it is clear that the former refers to the LIDO record and the latter to the date when the dataset was created viz. exported.

Changes needed in

musdb-md-xm-xsls/src/lido-1.1.xsl Line 1756 in 2b275b24dd
<lido:recordInfoSet>
ff:

                    <lido:recordInfoSet  lido:type="http://terminology.lido-schema.org/lido00470">
                        <xsl:for-each select="sources_objektinfo">
                            <lido:recordInfoLink>
                                <xsl:value-of select="."/>
                            </lido:recordInfoLink>
                        </xsl:for-each>
                        <xsl:for-each select="exportdatum">
                            <lido:recordMetadataDate  lido:type="http://terminology.lido-schema.org/lido00472">
                                <!--							  <lido:displayDate>  -->
                                <xsl:value-of select="."/>
                                <!--								</lido:displayDate>  -->
                            </lido:recordMetadataDate>
                        </xsl:for-each>
                    </lido:recordInfoSet>
It would be useful to add type attributes to recordInfoSet / recordMetadataDate so that it is clear that the former refers to the LIDO record and the latter to the date when the dataset was created viz. exported. Changes needed in https://gitea.armuli.eu/museum-digital/musdb-md-xm-xsls/src/commit/2b275b24dd4377ccc27eef79c8adb8de21d6f57b/src/lido-1.1.xsl#L1756 ff: ``` <lido:recordInfoSet lido:type="http://terminology.lido-schema.org/lido00470"> <xsl:for-each select="sources_objektinfo"> <lido:recordInfoLink> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </lido:recordInfoLink> </xsl:for-each> <xsl:for-each select="exportdatum"> <lido:recordMetadataDate lido:type="http://terminology.lido-schema.org/lido00472"> <!-- <lido:displayDate> --> <xsl:value-of select="."/> <!-- </lido:displayDate> --> </lido:recordMetadataDate> </xsl:for-each> </lido:recordInfoSet> ```
jrenslin commented 2025-12-15 15:06:42 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Hi, can you create a PR? Please note that changes to the LIDO 1.1 export are rather inconsequential. LIDO 1.0 is still (by far) the primary LIDO variant. Also, any changes to the LIDO 1.1 export should be simultaneously introduced to the EODEM export.

Hi, can you create a PR? Please note that changes to the LIDO 1.1 export are rather inconsequential. LIDO 1.0 is still (by far) the primary LIDO variant. Also, any changes to the LIDO 1.1 export should be simultaneously introduced to the EODEM export.
awinkler commented 2025-12-15 17:48:41 +01:00
Author
Member
Copy Link

done with PR #14

done with PR #14
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
kind/breaking
Critical issue that breaks a page
 kind/bug
Something is not working
 kind/docs
This concerns the documentation
 kind/enhancement
Improvements on existing features
 kind/feature
New features
 kind/lint
Code linting error
 kind/proposal
Suggestion or proposal
 kind/question
A question
 kind/refactor
Refactoring code
 kind/security
Security issue
 kind/testing
Concerns the test setup
 kind/translation
Concerns multilinguality
 kind/ui
Concerns the user interface
 priority/critical
Critical issue, highest priority
 priority/high
High priority issue
 priority/low
Low priority issue
 priority/medium
Medium priority issue
 reviewed/duplicate
This is a duplicate
 reviewed/invalid
This is an invalid issue
 reviewed/wontfix
This is issue will not be fixed
 status/done
This issue has been fixed
 status/needs-feedback
This issue needs feedback
kind/breaking
Critical issue that breaks a page
 kind/bug
Something is not working
 kind/docs
This concerns the documentation
 kind/enhancement
Improvements on existing features
 kind/feature
New features
 kind/lint
Code linting error
 kind/proposal
Suggestion or proposal
 kind/question
A question
 kind/refactor
Refactoring code
 kind/security
Security issue
 kind/testing
Concerns the test setup
 kind/translation
Concerns multilinguality
 kind/ui
Concerns the user interface
 priority/critical
Critical issue, highest priority
 priority/high
High priority issue
 priority/low
Low priority issue
 priority/medium
Medium priority issue
 reviewed/duplicate
This is a duplicate
 reviewed/invalid
This is an invalid issue
 reviewed/wontfix
This is issue will not be fixed
 status/done
This issue has been fixed
 status/needs-feedback
This issue needs feedback
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
abecker adamm agoll akoch anowicki arnel awinkler bbaumecker bednarikj cmagdo cotte cpitzen dyanc emalygina fvhagel hkuper hwarth-geraci jjuergens jrenslin jvpilgrim korilo krifo lluethi manders mhartmann mkarbe mkisser mportius neikermann nfuelbier nklingspor shollmann sopfermann stefan swassermann szunkel ufladerer
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: museum-digital/musdb-md-xm-xsls#13
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?